Detecting DeFi Risk, Before It Breaks
← All Protocol Ratings
Rating Screen · Methodology v1.1

Suilend

Lending · SEND · $0.13B TVL. Screen grades as of November 12, 2026: Solvency BB, Legitimacy BB, Growth CCC. Sui ecosystem leader; young chain risk.

Data As Of November 12, 2026 Methodology v1.1 (screen, provisional) Previous Screen July 27, 2026 Caps Triggered 0
SolvencyCREDIT GRADE
BB
51.8 / 100
Will it survive and pay users back?
Legitimacy
BB
58.5 / 100
Is it real, credible, delivering its stated aim?
GrowthOUTLOOK
CCC
27 / 100
Adoption toward the protocol's own goal, peer-relative.
Re-screen · November 12, 2026

What Changed Since July 27, 2026

Input / GradeJuly 27, 2026November 12, 2026
TVL$0.7B$0.13B
12-month TVL change-25%-68%
Worst 90-day drawdown45%30%
Drawdown scored45% (90-day only, v1.0)68% (worse of 90-day and 12-month, v1.1)
Solvency (credit grade)BB · 58BB · 51.8
GrowthB · 32.3CCC · 27

TVL figures: DefiLlama, parent-level listing. The July 27, 2026 TVL was an analyst estimate and may have used a narrower definition, so part of the TVL difference can be definitional. Only these three inputs were refreshed in the re-screen; sustainability, unlocks, risk, audits, team, delivery, governance, category share and momentum were left as the July 27, 2026 estimates.

Axis I · Credit Grade

Solvency — BB

Solvency screens at BB (51.8 / 100), unchanged from the July 27, 2026 screen. The worst 90-day TVL drawdown is 30% and 12-month TVL change is -68%. TVL stability is scored on the 12-month decline of 68%, because it is worse than the latest 90 days. Sustainability ratio (2x), unlock pressure (12%) and risk quality (6 / 10) are carried over from July 27, 2026.

Solvency ScorecardBB
MetricRawNormalizedWeightWeighted
Sustainability ratio (revenue / emissions)2x
30%24
Does it earn more than it prints? Above 1x is self-sustaining.
TVL stability (worse of 90-day drawdown and 12-month decline)68%
25%3.8
Bank-run indicator. Worst 90-day drawdown 30%, 12-month TVL change -68%; the worse of the two is scored, so a calm quarter cannot erase a long decline.
Unlock pressure (next 12 months)12%
15%6
Incoming insider sell pressure vs circulating supply.
Risk quality (collateral, oracle, exploit posture)6 / 10
30%18
Combined collateral quality, price-feed dependence, and loss history.
FINAL DIMENSION SCORE51.8 → BB
Axis II · Legitimacy Score

Legitimacy — BB

Legitimacy screens at BB (58.5 / 100). No Legitimacy input was refreshed in the November 12, 2026 re-screen, so the grade is unchanged from July 27, 2026.

Legitimacy ScorecardBB
MetricRawNormalizedWeightWeighted
Audit coverage6 / 10
25%15
Code credibility: firms, recency, findings resolved.
Team & transparency7 / 10
25%17.5
Doxxed vs anonymous; track record; disclosure quality.
Delivery vs stated roadmap7 / 10
20%14
Does shipped product match the promise? The core legitimacy test.
Governance & decentralization4 / 10
30%12
Real distributed control vs theater; participation quality.
FINAL DIMENSION SCORE58.5 → BB
Axis III · Growth Outlook

Growth — CCC

Growth screens at CCC (27 / 100), previously B in the July 27, 2026 screen. TVL is $0.13B, -68% over twelve months (it was -25% at the previous screen). Category share (3%) and momentum (5 / 10) are carried over from July 27, 2026.

Growth ScorecardCCC
MetricRawNormalizedWeightWeighted
TVL 12-month trend-68%
35%3.5
Adoption of the core product, in absolute terms.
Category market share3%
30%6
Peer-relative position: winning or losing its niche.
Momentum & users5 / 10
35%17.5
Usage trajectory and integration growth, filtered for incentives.
FINAL DIMENSION SCORE27 → CCC
Verdict

Where Suilend Lands

The credit grade is Solvency BB. Legitimacy is BB and the Growth outlook is CCC; the weakest axis is Growth. These grades use TVL data as of November 12, 2026 and qualitative inputs from July 27, 2026.

Credit Grade — Solvency
BB
51.8 / 100

The credit grade answers one question: can Suilend survive stress and pay its users back. Legitimacy (BB) and the Growth outlook (CCC) are published beside it and are never averaged into it. Weakest axis: Growth.

Analyst Note
Sui ecosystem leader; young chain risk.
Screen vs full rating. This is Methodology v1.1 applied in screening form: the same bands, weights, caps and grade scale as the full Aave workbook (with the v1.1 change to TVL stability described above), reduced to the highest-signal metrics per dimension so the whole universe stays comparable in one table. Screen grades are provisional. A full rating — per-metric sourcing plus four stress scenarios — is produced when a protocol is selected for publication. TVL, 12-month TVL change and 90-day drawdown are from DefiLlama, parent-level listing as of November 12, 2026; every other input is an analyst estimate as of July 27, 2026, drawn from public data (DefiLlama, protocol docs, governance forums, rekt.news) and judgment, and should be verified before being relied upon.
Lending Peers
ProtocolSolvencyLegitimacyGrowth
Suilend (this page)BBBBCCC
AaveAAABB
MorphoAAAA
JustLendABBBBB
SparkAABB
KaminoBBBBBBB
CompoundBBBAB
VenusABBCCC
EulerBBAB
BenqiBBBBBCCC
NAVIBBBCCC
MoonwellBBBBBCCC

See all rated protocols →

Want the full treatment? See the complete Aave rating — per-metric sourcing, four stress scenarios, and notching-cap analysis — for what a published rating looks like. Join the waitlist to get each new full rating as it publishes.
Analyst Commentary · July 27, 2026

Background From The Previous Screen

Dated commentary. Written for the July 27, 2026 screen under Methodology v1.0. Figures and grades quoted in it are as of that date. Where they differ from the scorecards above, the scorecards are current.

Overview

Suilend is the dominant money market on Sui, built by the Solend team who carried their lending experience — including its hard lessons — to a newer chain. It leads its ecosystem while carrying the compound risk of being a young protocol on a young chain.

Solvency

Solvency screens at BB. Fee coverage (~2x) is respectable, but a 45% drawdown and a heavy 12% unlock schedule weigh, and the 6/10 risk score reflects thin oracle and liquidity infrastructure on Sui relative to mature EVM chains — the liquidation path is only as good as the market depth beneath it.

Legitimacy

Legitimacy screens at BB. The team's Solend history cuts both ways: real operating experience, including the 2022 whale-account governance episode that showed how emergency powers get used under stress. Audits (6/10) are the weakest input; governance is nominal at this stage.

Growth

Growth screens at B: 3% of the lending category, -25% TVL, fair momentum. Ecosystem leadership on Sui is worth little in a category measured across all chains.

Verdict

Composite B. Chain-concentrated, unlock-heavy, competently run. A full rating would examine Sui's liquidation infrastructure directly — that is where a small lender on a young chain actually breaks.