DeFiScoreAudit shield logo
DeFiScoreAudit
Detecting DeFi Risk, Before It Breaks
← Back to DeFiScoreAudit
Rating Screen · Methodology v1.0

Yearn

Yield · YFI · $0.3B TVL. Yearn invented the yield aggregator and, with YFI's fair launch, wrote one of DeFi's founding myths. The screen scores what remains: a technically sound vault protocol with a diversified treasury, a durable contributor culture, and a shrinking reason to exist as yield opportunities moved on-chain-native and vault strategies commoditized.

Screened July 27, 2026 Methodology v1.0 (screen) Caps Triggered 0
Solvency
A
70.3 / 100
Will it survive and pay users back?
Legitimacy
BBB
67.5 / 100
Is it real, credible, delivering its stated aim?
Growth
CCC
25.3 / 100
Adoption toward the protocol's own goal, peer-relative.
Axis I · Credit Grade

Solvency — A

Solvency screens at A on defensive characteristics: essentially zero unlock pressure (YFI's supply has been fixed since 2020), a moderate drawdown, a 7/10 risk score built on years of vault operation with strategy-level incidents contained rather than systemic, and a treasury that was diversified early and deliberately. Fee coverage (~1x) is break-even.

Solvency ScorecardA
MetricRawNormalizedWeightWeighted
Sustainability ratio (revenue / emissions)1x
30%18
Does it earn more than it prints? Above 1x is self-sustaining.
TVL stability (max 90-day drawdown)35%
25%16.3
Bank-run indicator: worst 90-day deposit flight.
Unlock pressure (next 12 months)0.5%
15%15
Incoming insider sell pressure vs circulating supply.
Risk quality (collateral, oracle, exploit posture)7 / 10
30%21
Combined collateral quality, price-feed dependence, and loss history.
FINAL DIMENSION SCORE70.3 → A
Axis II · Legitimacy Score

Legitimacy — BBB

Legitimacy screens at BBB. Audits remain solid and governance (6/10) is genuinely participatory in the veYFI structure. The deduction is delivery (6/10): v3 shipped, but the pace and clarity of direction have wandered across multiple strategic pivots.

Legitimacy ScorecardBBB
MetricRawNormalizedWeightWeighted
Audit coverage8 / 10
25%20
Code credibility: firms, recency, findings resolved.
Team & transparency7 / 10
25%17.5
Doxxed vs anonymous; track record; disclosure quality.
Delivery vs stated roadmap6 / 10
20%12
Does shipped product match the promise? The core legitimacy test.
Governance & decentralization6 / 10
30%18
Real distributed control vs theater; participation quality.
FINAL DIMENSION SCORE67.5 → BBB
Axis III · Adoption Trajectory

Growth — CCC

Growth screens at CCC: 4% share, -35% TVL, 3/10 momentum. The aggregator layer is being disintermediated by protocols that issue their own yield-bearing tokens directly.

Growth ScorecardCCC
MetricRawNormalizedWeightWeighted
TVL 12-month trend-35%
35%8.8
Adoption of the core product, in absolute terms.
Category market share4%
30%6
Peer-relative position: winning or losing its niche.
Momentum & users3 / 10
35%10.5
Usage trajectory and integration growth, filtered for incentives.
FINAL DIMENSION SCORE25.3 → CCC
Verdict

Where Yearn Lands

Composite CCC. A well-capitalized, well-governed protocol in a category the market has partially outgrown. A full rating would focus on treasury runway relative to contributor cost — Yearn's solvency question is organizational, not financial.

Composite — Conservative (Recommended Headline)
CCC
25.3 / 100 · lowest of the three dimensions

"A chain is as strong as its weakest link." The conservative composite takes the weakest dimension and inherits any notching cap, so a single structural weakness cannot be diluted by strength elsewhere.

Analyst Note
DeFi-summer icon; relevance fading; treasury diversified.
Screen vs full rating. This is Methodology v1.0 applied in screening form: the same bands, weights, caps and grade scale as the full Aave workbook, reduced to the highest-signal metrics per dimension so the whole universe stays comparable in one table. Screen grades are provisional. A full rating — per-metric sourcing plus four stress scenarios — is produced when a protocol is selected for publication. Every input is an analyst estimate as of July 27, 2026, drawn from public data (DefiLlama, protocol docs, governance forums, rekt.news) and judgment, and should be verified before being relied upon.
Want the full treatment? See the complete Aave rating — per-metric sourcing, four stress scenarios, and notching-cap analysis — for what a published rating looks like. Join the waitlist to get each new full rating as it publishes.