DeFiScoreAudit shield logo
DeFiScoreAudit
Detecting DeFi Risk, Before It Breaks
← Back to DeFiScoreAudit
Rating Screen · Methodology v1.0

Suilend

Lending · SEND · $0.7B TVL. Suilend is the dominant money market on Sui, built by the Solend team who carried their lending experience — including its hard lessons — to a newer chain. It leads its ecosystem while carrying the compound risk of being a young protocol on a young chain.

Screened July 27, 2026 Methodology v1.0 (screen) Caps Triggered 0
Solvency
BB
58 / 100
Will it survive and pay users back?
Legitimacy
BB
58.5 / 100
Is it real, credible, delivering its stated aim?
Growth
B
32.3 / 100
Adoption toward the protocol's own goal, peer-relative.
Axis I · Credit Grade

Solvency — BB

Solvency screens at BB. Fee coverage (~2x) is respectable, but a 45% drawdown and a heavy 12% unlock schedule weigh, and the 6/10 risk score reflects thin oracle and liquidity infrastructure on Sui relative to mature EVM chains — the liquidation path is only as good as the market depth beneath it.

Solvency ScorecardBB
MetricRawNormalizedWeightWeighted
Sustainability ratio (revenue / emissions)2x
30%24
Does it earn more than it prints? Above 1x is self-sustaining.
TVL stability (max 90-day drawdown)45%
25%10
Bank-run indicator: worst 90-day deposit flight.
Unlock pressure (next 12 months)12%
15%6
Incoming insider sell pressure vs circulating supply.
Risk quality (collateral, oracle, exploit posture)6 / 10
30%18
Combined collateral quality, price-feed dependence, and loss history.
FINAL DIMENSION SCORE58 → BB
Axis II · Legitimacy Score

Legitimacy — BB

Legitimacy screens at BB. The team's Solend history cuts both ways: real operating experience, including the 2022 whale-account governance episode that showed how emergency powers get used under stress. Audits (6/10) are the weakest input; governance is nominal at this stage.

Legitimacy ScorecardBB
MetricRawNormalizedWeightWeighted
Audit coverage6 / 10
25%15
Code credibility: firms, recency, findings resolved.
Team & transparency7 / 10
25%17.5
Doxxed vs anonymous; track record; disclosure quality.
Delivery vs stated roadmap7 / 10
20%14
Does shipped product match the promise? The core legitimacy test.
Governance & decentralization4 / 10
30%12
Real distributed control vs theater; participation quality.
FINAL DIMENSION SCORE58.5 → BB
Axis III · Adoption Trajectory

Growth — B

Growth screens at B: 3% of the lending category, -25% TVL, fair momentum. Ecosystem leadership on Sui is worth little in a category measured across all chains.

Growth ScorecardB
MetricRawNormalizedWeightWeighted
TVL 12-month trend-25%
35%8.8
Adoption of the core product, in absolute terms.
Category market share3%
30%6
Peer-relative position: winning or losing its niche.
Momentum & users5 / 10
35%17.5
Usage trajectory and integration growth, filtered for incentives.
FINAL DIMENSION SCORE32.3 → B
Verdict

Where Suilend Lands

Composite B. Chain-concentrated, unlock-heavy, competently run. A full rating would examine Sui's liquidation infrastructure directly — that is where a small lender on a young chain actually breaks.

Composite — Conservative (Recommended Headline)
B
32.3 / 100 · lowest of the three dimensions

"A chain is as strong as its weakest link." The conservative composite takes the weakest dimension and inherits any notching cap, so a single structural weakness cannot be diluted by strength elsewhere.

Analyst Note
Sui ecosystem leader; young chain risk.
Screen vs full rating. This is Methodology v1.0 applied in screening form: the same bands, weights, caps and grade scale as the full Aave workbook, reduced to the highest-signal metrics per dimension so the whole universe stays comparable in one table. Screen grades are provisional. A full rating — per-metric sourcing plus four stress scenarios — is produced when a protocol is selected for publication. Every input is an analyst estimate as of July 27, 2026, drawn from public data (DefiLlama, protocol docs, governance forums, rekt.news) and judgment, and should be verified before being relied upon.
Want the full treatment? See the complete Aave rating — per-metric sourcing, four stress scenarios, and notching-cap analysis — for what a published rating looks like. Join the waitlist to get each new full rating as it publishes.