DeFiScoreAudit shield logo
DeFiScoreAudit
Detecting DeFi Risk, Before It Breaks
← Back to DeFiScoreAudit
Rating Screen · Methodology v1.0

Spark

Lending · SPK · $3.7B TVL. Spark is Sky's lending subDAO — an Aave-lineage money market wired directly into the USDS ecosystem, deploying Sky's balance sheet as deep, protocol-owned liquidity. At $3.7B TVL it functions less like a startup lender and more like the credit arm of an established stablecoin issuer.

Screened July 27, 2026 Methodology v1.0 (screen) Caps Triggered 0
Solvency
A
74 / 100
Will it survive and pay users back?
Legitimacy
A
71 / 100
Is it real, credible, delivering its stated aim?
Growth
BB
54.8 / 100
Adoption toward the protocol's own goal, peer-relative.
Axis I · Credit Grade

Solvency — A

Solvency screens at A. The ~3x sustainability ratio benefits from Sky's direct liquidity provision, drawdown has been moderate, and the risk framework is inherited from the most battle-tested collateral operation in DeFi. Unlock pressure around 5% is the only middling input as SPK distribution proceeds.

Solvency ScorecardA
MetricRawNormalizedWeightWeighted
Sustainability ratio (revenue / emissions)3x
30%24
Does it earn more than it prints? Above 1x is self-sustaining.
TVL stability (max 90-day drawdown)30%
25%16.3
Bank-run indicator: worst 90-day deposit flight.
Unlock pressure (next 12 months)5%
15%9.8
Incoming insider sell pressure vs circulating supply.
Risk quality (collateral, oracle, exploit posture)8 / 10
30%24
Combined collateral quality, price-feed dependence, and loss history.
FINAL DIMENSION SCORE74 → A
Axis II · Legitimacy Score

Legitimacy — A

Legitimacy screens at A: audits are solid, the team executes within Sky's published roadmap, and delivery has been consistent. Governance scores 5/10 — as a subDAO, Spark's autonomy is real but bounded, and accountability routes through Sky's layered Endgame structure.

Legitimacy ScorecardA
MetricRawNormalizedWeightWeighted
Audit coverage8 / 10
25%20
Code credibility: firms, recency, findings resolved.
Team & transparency8 / 10
25%20
Doxxed vs anonymous; track record; disclosure quality.
Delivery vs stated roadmap8 / 10
20%16
Does shipped product match the promise? The core legitimacy test.
Governance & decentralization5 / 10
30%15
Real distributed control vs theater; participation quality.
FINAL DIMENSION SCORE71 → A
Axis III · Adoption Trajectory

Growth — BB

Growth screens at BB. A comparatively shallow TVL decline (~15%) and decent momentum from the Sky ecosystem integration are offset by 15% category share in lending's crowded field. Its growth is structurally tied to USDS adoption.

Growth ScorecardBB
MetricRawNormalizedWeightWeighted
TVL 12-month trend-15%
35%15.8
Adoption of the core product, in absolute terms.
Category market share15%
30%18
Peer-relative position: winning or losing its niche.
Momentum & users6 / 10
35%21
Usage trajectory and integration growth, filtered for incentives.
FINAL DIMENSION SCORE54.8 → BB
Verdict

Where Spark Lands

Composite BB. Effectively a leveraged bet on Sky's ecosystem executed with strong engineering. A full rating would analyze it jointly with Sky, since its credit profile cannot be separated from its parent's.

Composite — Conservative (Recommended Headline)
BB
54.8 / 100 · lowest of the three dimensions

"A chain is as strong as its weakest link." The conservative composite takes the weakest dimension and inherits any notching cap, so a single structural weakness cannot be diluted by strength elsewhere.

Analyst Note
Sky subDAO; inherits Maker risk framework.
Screen vs full rating. This is Methodology v1.0 applied in screening form: the same bands, weights, caps and grade scale as the full Aave workbook, reduced to the highest-signal metrics per dimension so the whole universe stays comparable in one table. Screen grades are provisional. A full rating — per-metric sourcing plus four stress scenarios — is produced when a protocol is selected for publication. Every input is an analyst estimate as of July 27, 2026, drawn from public data (DefiLlama, protocol docs, governance forums, rekt.news) and judgment, and should be verified before being relied upon.
Want the full treatment? See the complete Aave rating — per-metric sourcing, four stress scenarios, and notching-cap analysis — for what a published rating looks like. Join the waitlist to get each new full rating as it publishes.