DeFiScoreAudit shield logo
DeFiScoreAudit
Detecting DeFi Risk, Before It Breaks
← Back to DeFiScoreAudit
Rating Screen · Methodology v1.0

Solv

BTC Yield · SOLV · $0.9B TVL. Solv aggregates bitcoin yield — routing BTC into staking, restaking, and structured strategies through its SolvBTC wrapper family — and holds a meaningful ~30% share of the BTC-yield category. It also carries the screen's most explicit data-quality flag: past controversy over TVL accounting means its headline metrics deserve independent verification.

Screened July 27, 2026 Methodology v1.0 (screen) Caps Triggered 0
Solvency
BB
49 / 100
Will it survive and pay users back?
Legitimacy
BB
54 / 100
Is it real, credible, delivering its stated aim?
Growth
BB
46.8 / 100
Adoption toward the protocol's own goal, peer-relative.
Axis I · Credit Grade

Solvency — BB

Solvency screens at BB. Thin fee coverage (~1x), a 12% unlock schedule, and a 45% drawdown describe standard young-category economics; the 5/10 risk score adds the layered-wrapper problem — SolvBTC stacks custody, staking, and strategy risks that are hard to see through from the outside.

Solvency ScorecardBB
MetricRawNormalizedWeightWeighted
Sustainability ratio (revenue / emissions)1x
30%18
Does it earn more than it prints? Above 1x is self-sustaining.
TVL stability (max 90-day drawdown)45%
25%10
Bank-run indicator: worst 90-day deposit flight.
Unlock pressure (next 12 months)12%
15%6
Incoming insider sell pressure vs circulating supply.
Risk quality (collateral, oracle, exploit posture)5 / 10
30%15
Combined collateral quality, price-feed dependence, and loss history.
FINAL DIMENSION SCORE49 → BB
Axis II · Legitimacy Score

Legitimacy — BB

Legitimacy screens at BB, the deduction driven by history: the TVL-accounting episode is precisely the promise-versus-delivery gap the Legitimacy axis exists to price. Audits and team scores are middling; governance is nominal.

Legitimacy ScorecardBB
MetricRawNormalizedWeightWeighted
Audit coverage6 / 10
25%15
Code credibility: firms, recency, findings resolved.
Team & transparency6 / 10
25%15
Doxxed vs anonymous; track record; disclosure quality.
Delivery vs stated roadmap6 / 10
20%12
Does shipped product match the promise? The core legitimacy test.
Governance & decentralization4 / 10
30%12
Real distributed control vs theater; participation quality.
FINAL DIMENSION SCORE54 → BB
Axis III · Adoption Trajectory

Growth — BB

Growth screens at BB on genuine category share, against soft momentum and the BTC-fi retracement (-35%).

Growth ScorecardBB
MetricRawNormalizedWeightWeighted
TVL 12-month trend-35%
35%8.8
Adoption of the core product, in absolute terms.
Category market share30%
30%24
Peer-relative position: winning or losing its niche.
Momentum & users4 / 10
35%14
Usage trajectory and integration growth, filtered for incentives.
FINAL DIMENSION SCORE46.8 → BB
Verdict

Where Solv Lands

Composite BB with an asterisk the size of the methodology: verify before trusting any input. A full rating would begin as a forensic exercise — proof of reserves and flow-through of yield before any grade is publishable.

Composite — Conservative (Recommended Headline)
BB
46.8 / 100 · lowest of the three dimensions

"A chain is as strong as its weakest link." The conservative composite takes the weakest dimension and inherits any notching cap, so a single structural weakness cannot be diluted by strength elsewhere.

Analyst Note
BTC yield aggregation; past TVL-accounting controversy — verify metrics carefully.
Screen vs full rating. This is Methodology v1.0 applied in screening form: the same bands, weights, caps and grade scale as the full Aave workbook, reduced to the highest-signal metrics per dimension so the whole universe stays comparable in one table. Screen grades are provisional. A full rating — per-metric sourcing plus four stress scenarios — is produced when a protocol is selected for publication. Every input is an analyst estimate as of July 27, 2026, drawn from public data (DefiLlama, protocol docs, governance forums, rekt.news) and judgment, and should be verified before being relied upon.
Want the full treatment? See the complete Aave rating — per-metric sourcing, four stress scenarios, and notching-cap analysis — for what a published rating looks like. Join the waitlist to get each new full rating as it publishes.