DeFiScoreAudit shield logo
DeFiScoreAudit
Detecting DeFi Risk, Before It Breaks
← Back to DeFiScoreAudit
Rating Screen · Methodology v1.0

Sky (MakerDAO)

CDP · SKY · $8.5B TVL. Sky — the rebranded MakerDAO — is the longest-running solvency story in DeFi. The protocol behind DAI/USDS has operated a collateralized stablecoin through every crypto credit cycle since 2017, including the March 2020 Black Thursday liquidation crisis it survived and recapitalized from. At $8.5B TVL it still holds roughly 55% of the CDP category.

Screened July 27, 2026 Methodology v1.0 (screen) Caps Triggered 0
Solvency
A
79.3 / 100
Will it survive and pay users back?
Legitimacy
A
76.5 / 100
Is it real, credible, delivering its stated aim?
Growth
BBB
63.3 / 100
Adoption toward the protocol's own goal, peer-relative.
Axis I · Credit Grade

Solvency — A

Solvency screens at A. Revenue from stability fees and its RWA-heavy collateral book covers emissions roughly 4x over, drawdown has been comparatively shallow (~25%) for a protocol this size, and unlock pressure is immaterial. The risk posture reflects one of the most battle-tested liquidation engines on-chain — the deduction is for the growing complexity of the collateral book, which now spans on-chain and real-world assets.

Solvency ScorecardA
MetricRawNormalizedWeightWeighted
Sustainability ratio (revenue / emissions)4x
30%24
Does it earn more than it prints? Above 1x is self-sustaining.
TVL stability (max 90-day drawdown)25%
25%16.3
Bank-run indicator: worst 90-day deposit flight.
Unlock pressure (next 12 months)1%
15%15
Incoming insider sell pressure vs circulating supply.
Risk quality (collateral, oracle, exploit posture)8 / 10
30%24
Combined collateral quality, price-feed dependence, and loss history.
FINAL DIMENSION SCORE79.3 → A
Axis II · Legitimacy Score

Legitimacy — A

Legitimacy screens at A. Audit depth and track record are near best-in-class, and the Endgame restructuring into Sky and subDAOs was executed rather than merely announced. Governance is the soft spot: participation is delegate-concentrated, and the Endgame's layered structure makes accountability harder to trace than in the old single-DAO model.

Legitimacy ScorecardA
MetricRawNormalizedWeightWeighted
Audit coverage9 / 10
25%22.5
Code credibility: firms, recency, findings resolved.
Team & transparency8 / 10
25%20
Doxxed vs anonymous; track record; disclosure quality.
Delivery vs stated roadmap8 / 10
20%16
Does shipped product match the promise? The core legitimacy test.
Governance & decentralization6 / 10
30%18
Real distributed control vs theater; participation quality.
FINAL DIMENSION SCORE76.5 → A
Axis III · Adoption Trajectory

Growth — BBB

Growth screens at BBB — the strongest growth reading among the large incumbents. TVL is down a comparatively modest ~20% over twelve months, share is holding, and the USDS migration plus Spark subDAO give it live product surface. Momentum is steady rather than accelerating.

Growth ScorecardBBB
MetricRawNormalizedWeightWeighted
TVL 12-month trend-20%
35%15.8
Adoption of the core product, in absolute terms.
Category market share55%
30%30
Peer-relative position: winning or losing its niche.
Momentum & users5 / 10
35%17.5
Usage trajectory and integration growth, filtered for incentives.
FINAL DIMENSION SCORE63.3 → BBB
Verdict

Where Sky (MakerDAO) Lands

Composite BBB — investment grade on the screen, the highest composite among DeFi's old guard. A full rating would need to work through the RWA collateral concentration and the Endgame governance topology, but the screen's read is a protocol whose durability is demonstrated rather than promised.

Composite — Conservative (Recommended Headline)
BBB
63.3 / 100 · lowest of the three dimensions

"A chain is as strong as its weakest link." The conservative composite takes the weakest dimension and inherits any notching cap, so a single structural weakness cannot be diluted by strength elsewhere.

Analyst Note
Rebrand executed; USDS migration; long solvency track record incl. 2020 Black Thursday recovery.
Screen vs full rating. This is Methodology v1.0 applied in screening form: the same bands, weights, caps and grade scale as the full Aave workbook, reduced to the highest-signal metrics per dimension so the whole universe stays comparable in one table. Screen grades are provisional. A full rating — per-metric sourcing plus four stress scenarios — is produced when a protocol is selected for publication. Every input is an analyst estimate as of July 27, 2026, drawn from public data (DefiLlama, protocol docs, governance forums, rekt.news) and judgment, and should be verified before being relied upon.
Want the full treatment? See the complete Aave rating — per-metric sourcing, four stress scenarios, and notching-cap analysis — for what a published rating looks like. Join the waitlist to get each new full rating as it publishes.