DeFiScoreAudit shield logo
DeFiScoreAudit
Detecting DeFi Risk, Before It Breaks
← Back to DeFiScoreAudit
Rating Screen · Methodology v1.0

Rocket Pool

Liquid Staking · RPL · $1.5B TVL. Rocket Pool is the conscience of liquid staking: the most credibly decentralized major LST, with permissionless node operators and a governance culture that takes its own ideals seriously. The screen scores a protocol whose values are its moat — and its constraint.

Screened July 27, 2026 Methodology v1.0 (screen) Caps Triggered 0
Solvency
A
73.3 / 100
Will it survive and pay users back?
Legitimacy
AA
82 / 100
Is it real, credible, delivering its stated aim?
Growth
B
34.8 / 100
Adoption toward the protocol's own goal, peer-relative.
Axis I · Credit Grade

Solvency — A

Solvency screens at A. Negligible unlocks, moderate drawdown, mature risk posture (8/10) across years of incident-free operation. The sustainability ratio (~1.5x) is the softer input — decentralization has costs, and Rocket Pool's economics are structurally thinner than Lido's scale allows.

Solvency ScorecardA
MetricRawNormalizedWeightWeighted
Sustainability ratio (revenue / emissions)1.5x
30%18
Does it earn more than it prints? Above 1x is self-sustaining.
TVL stability (max 90-day drawdown)30%
25%16.3
Bank-run indicator: worst 90-day deposit flight.
Unlock pressure (next 12 months)1%
15%15
Incoming insider sell pressure vs circulating supply.
Risk quality (collateral, oracle, exploit posture)8 / 10
30%24
Combined collateral quality, price-feed dependence, and loss history.
FINAL DIMENSION SCORE73.3 → A
Axis II · Legitimacy Score

Legitimacy — AA

Legitimacy screens at AA, among the best in the universe: deep audits, a veteran public team, delivery through multiple protocol upgrades (Saturn on deck at snapshot), and 7/10 governance that is genuinely contested rather than performative. This is what the framework wants Legitimacy to look like.

Legitimacy ScorecardAA
MetricRawNormalizedWeightWeighted
Audit coverage9 / 10
25%22.5
Code credibility: firms, recency, findings resolved.
Team & transparency9 / 10
25%22.5
Doxxed vs anonymous; track record; disclosure quality.
Delivery vs stated roadmap8 / 10
20%16
Does shipped product match the promise? The core legitimacy test.
Governance & decentralization7 / 10
30%21
Real distributed control vs theater; participation quality.
FINAL DIMENSION SCORE82 → AA
Axis III · Adoption Trajectory

Growth — B

Growth screens at B, and it is the whole story: ~8% category share, 30% TVL decline, weak momentum as capital chased restaking yields Rocket Pool deliberately declined to chase. Principled positioning, punished trajectory.

Growth ScorecardB
MetricRawNormalizedWeightWeighted
TVL 12-month trend-30%
35%8.8
Adoption of the core product, in absolute terms.
Category market share8%
30%12
Peer-relative position: winning or losing its niche.
Momentum & users4 / 10
35%14
Usage trajectory and integration growth, filtered for incentives.
FINAL DIMENSION SCORE34.8 → B
Verdict

Where Rocket Pool Lands

Composite B, growth-capped. The screen's read: the highest-integrity design in its category with the weakest commercial momentum. A full rating would weigh whether Saturn's economics reforms can close the gap Lido and the LRTs opened.

Composite — Conservative (Recommended Headline)
B
34.8 / 100 · lowest of the three dimensions

"A chain is as strong as its weakest link." The conservative composite takes the weakest dimension and inherits any notching cap, so a single structural weakness cannot be diluted by strength elsewhere.

Analyst Note
Most decentralized major LST; growth lags Lido/restaking narratives.
Screen vs full rating. This is Methodology v1.0 applied in screening form: the same bands, weights, caps and grade scale as the full Aave workbook, reduced to the highest-signal metrics per dimension so the whole universe stays comparable in one table. Screen grades are provisional. A full rating — per-metric sourcing plus four stress scenarios — is produced when a protocol is selected for publication. Every input is an analyst estimate as of July 27, 2026, drawn from public data (DefiLlama, protocol docs, governance forums, rekt.news) and judgment, and should be verified before being relied upon.
Want the full treatment? See the complete Aave rating — per-metric sourcing, four stress scenarios, and notching-cap analysis — for what a published rating looks like. Join the waitlist to get each new full rating as it publishes.