DeFiScoreAudit shield logo
DeFiScoreAudit
Detecting DeFi Risk, Before It Breaks
← Back to DeFiScoreAudit
Rating Screen · Methodology v1.0

Renzo

LRT · REZ · $0.8B TVL. Renzo rode the restaking wave to top-tier LRT status with ezETH, then became the category's cautionary tale: the April 2024 depeg — when ezETH briefly traded far below intrinsic value amid a chaotic token-launch weekend — remains the reference event for LRT liquidity risk.

Screened July 27, 2026 Methodology v1.0 (screen) Caps Triggered 0
Solvency
B
44.5 / 100
Will it survive and pay users back?
Legitimacy
BBB
61 / 100
Is it real, credible, delivering its stated aim?
Growth
B
31.3 / 100
Adoption toward the protocol's own goal, peer-relative.
Axis I · Credit Grade

Solvency — B

Solvency screens at B. Sub-1x fee coverage, a 50% drawdown, and a 10% unlock schedule describe a protocol shrinking faster than it earns. The depeg exposed how thin exit liquidity gets exactly when everyone wants it; withdrawals have since been enabled, which structurally improves the picture.

Solvency ScorecardB
MetricRawNormalizedWeightWeighted
Sustainability ratio (revenue / emissions)0.8x
30%10.5
Does it earn more than it prints? Above 1x is self-sustaining.
TVL stability (max 90-day drawdown)50%
25%10
Bank-run indicator: worst 90-day deposit flight.
Unlock pressure (next 12 months)10%
15%6
Incoming insider sell pressure vs circulating supply.
Risk quality (collateral, oracle, exploit posture)6 / 10
30%18
Combined collateral quality, price-feed dependence, and loss history.
FINAL DIMENSION SCORE44.5 → B
Axis II · Legitimacy Score

Legitimacy — BBB

Legitimacy screens at BBB. The team communicated and remediated through the episode, and audits are adequate — but the depeg was at root a design-and-communication failure, and the framework prices it there rather than in Solvency alone.

Legitimacy ScorecardBBB
MetricRawNormalizedWeightWeighted
Audit coverage7 / 10
25%17.5
Code credibility: firms, recency, findings resolved.
Team & transparency7 / 10
25%17.5
Doxxed vs anonymous; track record; disclosure quality.
Delivery vs stated roadmap7 / 10
20%14
Does shipped product match the promise? The core legitimacy test.
Governance & decentralization4 / 10
30%12
Real distributed control vs theater; participation quality.
FINAL DIMENSION SCORE61 → BBB
Axis III · Adoption Trajectory

Growth — B

Growth screens at B with the weakest momentum in the LRT cohort (3/10): -45% TVL and a 10% share that continues to leak toward ether.fi.

Growth ScorecardB
MetricRawNormalizedWeightWeighted
TVL 12-month trend-45%
35%8.8
Adoption of the core product, in absolute terms.
Category market share10%
30%12
Peer-relative position: winning or losing its niche.
Momentum & users3 / 10
35%10.5
Usage trajectory and integration growth, filtered for incentives.
FINAL DIMENSION SCORE31.3 → B
Verdict

Where Renzo Lands

Composite B. The screen's read: a protocol permanently marked by one bad weekend, competently managed since. A full rating would stress exit liquidity above all else.

Composite — Conservative (Recommended Headline)
B
31.3 / 100 · lowest of the three dimensions

"A chain is as strong as its weakest link." The conservative composite takes the weakest dimension and inherits any notching cap, so a single structural weakness cannot be diluted by strength elsewhere.

Analyst Note
ezETH depeg episode Apr 2024; restaking-beta decline.
Screen vs full rating. This is Methodology v1.0 applied in screening form: the same bands, weights, caps and grade scale as the full Aave workbook, reduced to the highest-signal metrics per dimension so the whole universe stays comparable in one table. Screen grades are provisional. A full rating — per-metric sourcing plus four stress scenarios — is produced when a protocol is selected for publication. Every input is an analyst estimate as of July 27, 2026, drawn from public data (DefiLlama, protocol docs, governance forums, rekt.news) and judgment, and should be verified before being relied upon.
Want the full treatment? See the complete Aave rating — per-metric sourcing, four stress scenarios, and notching-cap analysis — for what a published rating looks like. Join the waitlist to get each new full rating as it publishes.