DeFiScoreAudit shield logo
DeFiScoreAudit
Detecting DeFi Risk, Before It Breaks
← Back to DeFiScoreAudit
Rating Screen · Methodology v1.0

Pendle

Yield · PENDLE · $5B TVL. Pendle invented and still defines on-chain yield-splitting — separating principal from yield so both can be traded — and at $5B TVL it owns roughly 70% of its category. It has been the venue where every major yield narrative (LSTs, restaking points, stablecoin yields) came to be priced.

Screened July 27, 2026 Methodology v1.0 (screen) Caps Triggered 0
Solvency
A
70.8 / 100
Will it survive and pay users back?
Legitimacy
A
76 / 100
Is it real, credible, delivering its stated aim?
Growth
BB
59.8 / 100
Adoption toward the protocol's own goal, peer-relative.
Axis I · Credit Grade

Solvency — A

Solvency screens at A, the best in the mid-cap cohort. Fees cover emissions ~2x, unlock pressure is low (~3%) with the token largely distributed, and the AMM's architecture has aged without incident — the risk score (8/10) reflects that maturity. The 40% drawdown is the one soft input: yield-trading TVL rotates violently with each narrative cycle.

Solvency ScorecardA
MetricRawNormalizedWeightWeighted
Sustainability ratio (revenue / emissions)2x
30%24
Does it earn more than it prints? Above 1x is self-sustaining.
TVL stability (max 90-day drawdown)40%
25%10
Bank-run indicator: worst 90-day deposit flight.
Unlock pressure (next 12 months)3%
15%12.8
Incoming insider sell pressure vs circulating supply.
Risk quality (collateral, oracle, exploit posture)8 / 10
30%24
Combined collateral quality, price-feed dependence, and loss history.
FINAL DIMENSION SCORE70.8 → A
Axis II · Legitimacy Score

Legitimacy — A

Legitimacy screens at A. The team has shipped relentlessly — V2, cross-chain expansion, and product iterations arrived on cadence — audits are layered, and vePENDLE governance actually functions, though concentration among large lockers earns the usual deduction.

Legitimacy ScorecardA
MetricRawNormalizedWeightWeighted
Audit coverage8 / 10
25%20
Code credibility: firms, recency, findings resolved.
Team & transparency8 / 10
25%20
Doxxed vs anonymous; track record; disclosure quality.
Delivery vs stated roadmap9 / 10
20%18
Does shipped product match the promise? The core legitimacy test.
Governance & decentralization6 / 10
30%18
Real distributed control vs theater; participation quality.
FINAL DIMENSION SCORE76 → A
Axis III · Adoption Trajectory

Growth — BB

Growth screens at BB. Dominant share and decent momentum are offset by a ~25% twelve-month TVL decline as the points-trading boom normalized. The protocol's growth is structurally episodic — it booms when a new yield source needs price discovery.

Growth ScorecardBB
MetricRawNormalizedWeightWeighted
TVL 12-month trend-25%
35%8.8
Adoption of the core product, in absolute terms.
Category market share70%
30%30
Peer-relative position: winning or losing its niche.
Momentum & users6 / 10
35%21
Usage trajectory and integration growth, filtered for incentives.
FINAL DIMENSION SCORE59.8 → BB
Verdict

Where Pendle Lands

Composite BB, held there by cycle-dependent growth rather than any quality concern. On balance-sheet and execution metrics Pendle screens as one of the strongest mid-caps in the universe and a natural early candidate for full coverage.

Composite — Conservative (Recommended Headline)
BB
59.8 / 100 · lowest of the three dimensions

"A chain is as strong as its weakest link." The conservative composite takes the weakest dimension and inherits any notching cap, so a single structural weakness cannot be diluted by strength elsewhere.

Analyst Note
Category-defining yield-splitting; revenue tied to yield-trading cycle.
Screen vs full rating. This is Methodology v1.0 applied in screening form: the same bands, weights, caps and grade scale as the full Aave workbook, reduced to the highest-signal metrics per dimension so the whole universe stays comparable in one table. Screen grades are provisional. A full rating — per-metric sourcing plus four stress scenarios — is produced when a protocol is selected for publication. Every input is an analyst estimate as of July 27, 2026, drawn from public data (DefiLlama, protocol docs, governance forums, rekt.news) and judgment, and should be verified before being relied upon.
Want the full treatment? See the complete Aave rating — per-metric sourcing, four stress scenarios, and notching-cap analysis — for what a published rating looks like. Join the waitlist to get each new full rating as it publishes.