DeFiScoreAudit shield logo
DeFiScoreAudit
Detecting DeFi Risk, Before It Breaks
← Back to DeFiScoreAudit
Rating Screen · Methodology v1.0

Lombard

BTC LST · BARD · $1.5B TVL. Lombard's LBTC is the leading liquid bitcoin staking token — the wrapper through which most staked BTC reaches DeFi — giving it ~60% share of a category that barely existed two years ago. The screen scores a young leader carrying young-protocol risks.

Screened July 27, 2026 Methodology v1.0 (screen) Caps Triggered 0
Solvency
BB
52 / 100
Will it survive and pay users back?
Legitimacy
BBB
61 / 100
Is it real, credible, delivering its stated aim?
Growth
BB
56.3 / 100
Adoption toward the protocol's own goal, peer-relative.
Axis I · Credit Grade

Solvency — BB

Solvency screens at BB. The sustainability ratio (~1x) is thin, ~15% of supply unlocks over the next year, and the 45% drawdown tracks the BTC-fi retracement. The risk score (6/10) carries the structural point: LBTC's security model includes custodial-adjacent trust assumptions in the consortium securing deposits — closer to a federation than to trustless staking.

Solvency ScorecardBB
MetricRawNormalizedWeightWeighted
Sustainability ratio (revenue / emissions)1x
30%18
Does it earn more than it prints? Above 1x is self-sustaining.
TVL stability (max 90-day drawdown)45%
25%10
Bank-run indicator: worst 90-day deposit flight.
Unlock pressure (next 12 months)15%
15%6
Incoming insider sell pressure vs circulating supply.
Risk quality (collateral, oracle, exploit posture)6 / 10
30%18
Combined collateral quality, price-feed dependence, and loss history.
FINAL DIMENSION SCORE52 → BB
Axis II · Legitimacy Score

Legitimacy — BBB

Legitimacy screens at BBB: adequate audits, a credible team, and delivery that has kept pace with the category. Governance is minimal (4/10) at this stage, with the consortium and team holding effective control.

Legitimacy ScorecardBBB
MetricRawNormalizedWeightWeighted
Audit coverage7 / 10
25%17.5
Code credibility: firms, recency, findings resolved.
Team & transparency7 / 10
25%17.5
Doxxed vs anonymous; track record; disclosure quality.
Delivery vs stated roadmap7 / 10
20%14
Does shipped product match the promise? The core legitimacy test.
Governance & decentralization4 / 10
30%12
Real distributed control vs theater; participation quality.
FINAL DIMENSION SCORE61 → BBB
Axis III · Adoption Trajectory

Growth — BB

Growth screens at BB: category dominance and fair momentum against a 35% TVL decline. Like Babylon upstream of it, its growth resumes if and when BTC-fi yields become real rather than points-denominated.

Growth ScorecardBB
MetricRawNormalizedWeightWeighted
TVL 12-month trend-35%
35%8.8
Adoption of the core product, in absolute terms.
Category market share60%
30%30
Peer-relative position: winning or losing its niche.
Momentum & users5 / 10
35%17.5
Usage trajectory and integration growth, filtered for incentives.
FINAL DIMENSION SCORE56.3 → BB
Verdict

Where Lombard Lands

Composite BB. Category leadership with concentrated trust assumptions. A full rating would center on the custody/consortium model — the input that most differentiates BTC 'staking' wrappers from their Ethereum analogues.

Composite — Conservative (Recommended Headline)
BB
52 / 100 · lowest of the three dimensions

"A chain is as strong as its weakest link." The conservative composite takes the weakest dimension and inherits any notching cap, so a single structural weakness cannot be diluted by strength elsewhere.

Analyst Note
LBTC leader; young protocol, unlock-heavy, custodial-adjacent trust assumptions.
Screen vs full rating. This is Methodology v1.0 applied in screening form: the same bands, weights, caps and grade scale as the full Aave workbook, reduced to the highest-signal metrics per dimension so the whole universe stays comparable in one table. Screen grades are provisional. A full rating — per-metric sourcing plus four stress scenarios — is produced when a protocol is selected for publication. Every input is an analyst estimate as of July 27, 2026, drawn from public data (DefiLlama, protocol docs, governance forums, rekt.news) and judgment, and should be verified before being relied upon.
Want the full treatment? See the complete Aave rating — per-metric sourcing, four stress scenarios, and notching-cap analysis — for what a published rating looks like. Join the waitlist to get each new full rating as it publishes.