DeFiScoreAudit shield logo
DeFiScoreAudit
Detecting DeFi Risk, Before It Breaks
← Back to DeFiScoreAudit
Rating Screen · Methodology v1.0

Jupiter

DEX Aggregator · JUP · $2.5B TVL. Jupiter is Solana's liquidity front door — the aggregator through which the majority of the chain's swap flow routes — and it is spending that position aggressively to become a super-app: perps, launchpad, mobile, and portfolio products all shipped within the snapshot window.

Screened July 27, 2026 Methodology v1.0 (screen) Caps Triggered 0
Solvency
BBB
64.8 / 100
Will it survive and pay users back?
Legitimacy
A
73 / 100
Is it real, credible, delivering its stated aim?
Growth
BB
59.8 / 100
Adoption toward the protocol's own goal, peer-relative.
Axis I · Credit Grade

Solvency — BBB

Solvency screens at BBB. Fee generation is genuinely strong (~4x sustainability) because aggregation and perps monetize volume regardless of TVL, but the 45% drawdown and ongoing ~8% JUP unlocks weigh on the screen. Risk posture is reasonable; the aggregator surface is inherently wide, touching every venue it routes through.

Solvency ScorecardBBB
MetricRawNormalizedWeightWeighted
Sustainability ratio (revenue / emissions)4x
30%24
Does it earn more than it prints? Above 1x is self-sustaining.
TVL stability (max 90-day drawdown)45%
25%10
Bank-run indicator: worst 90-day deposit flight.
Unlock pressure (next 12 months)8%
15%9.8
Incoming insider sell pressure vs circulating supply.
Risk quality (collateral, oracle, exploit posture)7 / 10
30%21
Combined collateral quality, price-feed dependence, and loss history.
FINAL DIMENSION SCORE64.8 → BBB
Axis II · Legitimacy Score

Legitimacy — A

Legitimacy screens at A on the strength of team and delivery — the shipping cadence is among the best in DeFi, and community communication is unusually direct. Audit depth (7/10) trails the expanding product surface, and governance, despite active JUP voting, still concentrates practical control with the core team.

Legitimacy ScorecardA
MetricRawNormalizedWeightWeighted
Audit coverage7 / 10
25%17.5
Code credibility: firms, recency, findings resolved.
Team & transparency9 / 10
25%22.5
Doxxed vs anonymous; track record; disclosure quality.
Delivery vs stated roadmap9 / 10
20%18
Does shipped product match the promise? The core legitimacy test.
Governance & decentralization5 / 10
30%15
Real distributed control vs theater; participation quality.
FINAL DIMENSION SCORE73 → A
Axis III · Adoption Trajectory

Growth — BB

Growth screens at BB: commanding 60% category share and fair momentum against a 40% twelve-month TVL decline that tracks Solana's cycle. The super-app strategy is an attempt to buy uncorrelated growth; the screen scores its progress, not its ambition.

Growth ScorecardBB
MetricRawNormalizedWeightWeighted
TVL 12-month trend-40%
35%8.8
Adoption of the core product, in absolute terms.
Category market share60%
30%30
Peer-relative position: winning or losing its niche.
Momentum & users6 / 10
35%21
Usage trajectory and integration growth, filtered for incentives.
FINAL DIMENSION SCORE59.8 → BB
Verdict

Where Jupiter Lands

Composite BB. Strong operator, honest chain-beta, live dilution. The full-rating question is whether fee diversity across the product suite can outgrow the unlock schedule.

Composite — Conservative (Recommended Headline)
BB
59.8 / 100 · lowest of the three dimensions

"A chain is as strong as its weakest link." The conservative composite takes the weakest dimension and inherits any notching cap, so a single structural weakness cannot be diluted by strength elsewhere.

Analyst Note
Solana super-app ambition; strong fees; JUP unlocks ongoing.
Screen vs full rating. This is Methodology v1.0 applied in screening form: the same bands, weights, caps and grade scale as the full Aave workbook, reduced to the highest-signal metrics per dimension so the whole universe stays comparable in one table. Screen grades are provisional. A full rating — per-metric sourcing plus four stress scenarios — is produced when a protocol is selected for publication. Every input is an analyst estimate as of July 27, 2026, drawn from public data (DefiLlama, protocol docs, governance forums, rekt.news) and judgment, and should be verified before being relied upon.
Want the full treatment? See the complete Aave rating — per-metric sourcing, four stress scenarios, and notching-cap analysis — for what a published rating looks like. Join the waitlist to get each new full rating as it publishes.