DeFiScoreAudit shield logo
DeFiScoreAudit
Detecting DeFi Risk, Before It Breaks
← Back to DeFiScoreAudit
Rating Screen · Methodology v1.0

ether.fi

LRT · ETHFI · $6B TVL. ether.fi is the largest liquid restaking token issuer at $6B TVL and ~45% of the LRT category, and it is deliberately diversifying beyond restaking beta — its cash-card and neobank product line is an attempt to attach consumer fee revenue to what began as a yield wrapper.

Screened July 27, 2026 Methodology v1.0 (screen) Caps Triggered 0
Solvency
BBB
64.8 / 100
Will it survive and pay users back?
Legitimacy
A
71 / 100
Is it real, credible, delivering its stated aim?
Growth
BB
53.8 / 100
Adoption toward the protocol's own goal, peer-relative.
Axis I · Credit Grade

Solvency — BBB

Solvency screens at BBB. A ~2x sustainability ratio is respectable for a young protocol and distinguishes it from pre-revenue restaking peers, but the 40% drawdown shows how tightly its deposits track the restaking cycle, and ~8% annual unlock pressure is non-trivial. Risk posture is reasonable with the caveat that every LRT inherits EigenLayer's still-maturing slashing machinery underneath.

Solvency ScorecardBBB
MetricRawNormalizedWeightWeighted
Sustainability ratio (revenue / emissions)2x
30%24
Does it earn more than it prints? Above 1x is self-sustaining.
TVL stability (max 90-day drawdown)40%
25%10
Bank-run indicator: worst 90-day deposit flight.
Unlock pressure (next 12 months)8%
15%9.8
Incoming insider sell pressure vs circulating supply.
Risk quality (collateral, oracle, exploit posture)7 / 10
30%21
Combined collateral quality, price-feed dependence, and loss history.
FINAL DIMENSION SCORE64.8 → BBB
Axis II · Legitimacy Score

Legitimacy — A

Legitimacy screens at A: solid audit cadence, a public and responsive team, and consistent shipping — the product diversification arrived on schedule rather than as vaporware. Governance is young and foundation-weighted, which is the main deduction.

Legitimacy ScorecardA
MetricRawNormalizedWeightWeighted
Audit coverage8 / 10
25%20
Code credibility: firms, recency, findings resolved.
Team & transparency8 / 10
25%20
Doxxed vs anonymous; track record; disclosure quality.
Delivery vs stated roadmap8 / 10
20%16
Does shipped product match the promise? The core legitimacy test.
Governance & decentralization5 / 10
30%15
Real distributed control vs theater; participation quality.
FINAL DIMENSION SCORE71 → A
Axis III · Adoption Trajectory

Growth — BB

Growth screens at BB. Share of the LRT category is strong and momentum (6/10) benefits from the consumer product push, but twelve-month TVL is down ~30% with the restaking tide. The screen credits the diversification strategy without yet paying for results.

Growth ScorecardBB
MetricRawNormalizedWeightWeighted
TVL 12-month trend-30%
35%8.8
Adoption of the core product, in absolute terms.
Category market share45%
30%24
Peer-relative position: winning or losing its niche.
Momentum & users6 / 10
35%21
Usage trajectory and integration growth, filtered for incentives.
FINAL DIMENSION SCORE53.8 → BB
Verdict

Where ether.fi Lands

Composite BB. Best-of-category positioning with the same structural question as all LRTs: whether native revenue can decouple from restaking sentiment. The neobank line is the differentiator to track in a full rating.

Composite — Conservative (Recommended Headline)
BB
53.8 / 100 · lowest of the three dimensions

"A chain is as strong as its weakest link." The conservative composite takes the weakest dimension and inherits any notching cap, so a single structural weakness cannot be diluted by strength elsewhere.

Analyst Note
Largest LRT; expanding into cards/neobank product line.
Screen vs full rating. This is Methodology v1.0 applied in screening form: the same bands, weights, caps and grade scale as the full Aave workbook, reduced to the highest-signal metrics per dimension so the whole universe stays comparable in one table. Screen grades are provisional. A full rating — per-metric sourcing plus four stress scenarios — is produced when a protocol is selected for publication. Every input is an analyst estimate as of July 27, 2026, drawn from public data (DefiLlama, protocol docs, governance forums, rekt.news) and judgment, and should be verified before being relied upon.
Want the full treatment? See the complete Aave rating — per-metric sourcing, four stress scenarios, and notching-cap analysis — for what a published rating looks like. Join the waitlist to get each new full rating as it publishes.