DeFiScoreAudit shield logo
DeFiScoreAudit
Detecting DeFi Risk, Before It Breaks
← Back to DeFiScoreAudit
Rating Screen · Methodology v1.0

Compound

Lending · COMP · $1.2B TVL. Compound is the protocol that invented pooled algorithmic lending and, for a time, defined DeFi itself. The screen scores a blue-chip in graceful decline: the codebase remains among the most trusted in the industry while the franchise steadily cedes ground to Aave's scale and Morpho's architecture.

Screened July 27, 2026 Methodology v1.0 (screen) Caps Triggered 0
Solvency
A
73.3 / 100
Will it survive and pay users back?
Legitimacy
A
72.5 / 100
Is it real, credible, delivering its stated aim?
Growth
B
31.3 / 100
Adoption toward the protocol's own goal, peer-relative.
Axis I · Credit Grade

Solvency — A

Solvency screens at A. The Comet (v3) architecture is conservative and battle-tested, drawdown is moderate, unlocks negligible, and the 8/10 risk score reflects one of the longest clean operating records in lending. The ~1.5x sustainability ratio is adequate but no longer compounding.

Solvency ScorecardA
MetricRawNormalizedWeightWeighted
Sustainability ratio (revenue / emissions)1.5x
30%18
Does it earn more than it prints? Above 1x is self-sustaining.
TVL stability (max 90-day drawdown)30%
25%16.3
Bank-run indicator: worst 90-day deposit flight.
Unlock pressure (next 12 months)1%
15%15
Incoming insider sell pressure vs circulating supply.
Risk quality (collateral, oracle, exploit posture)8 / 10
30%24
Combined collateral quality, price-feed dependence, and loss history.
FINAL DIMENSION SCORE73.3 → A
Axis II · Legitimacy Score

Legitimacy — A

Legitimacy screens at A on audit depth and pedigree, with the notable deduction in delivery (6/10): development pace has visibly slowed, governance-funded initiatives have churned, and the roadmap has thinned where competitors' have thickened.

Legitimacy ScorecardA
MetricRawNormalizedWeightWeighted
Audit coverage9 / 10
25%22.5
Code credibility: firms, recency, findings resolved.
Team & transparency8 / 10
25%20
Doxxed vs anonymous; track record; disclosure quality.
Delivery vs stated roadmap6 / 10
20%12
Does shipped product match the promise? The core legitimacy test.
Governance & decentralization6 / 10
30%18
Real distributed control vs theater; participation quality.
FINAL DIMENSION SCORE72.5 → A
Axis III · Adoption Trajectory

Growth — B

Growth screens at B, the binding dimension: 5% category share, 25% TVL decline, and 3/10 momentum — the lowest among major lenders. The protocol retains integrations and trust but is no longer where new collateral goes first.

Growth ScorecardB
MetricRawNormalizedWeightWeighted
TVL 12-month trend-25%
35%8.8
Adoption of the core product, in absolute terms.
Category market share5%
30%12
Peer-relative position: winning or losing its niche.
Momentum & users3 / 10
35%10.5
Usage trajectory and integration growth, filtered for incentives.
FINAL DIMENSION SCORE31.3 → B
Verdict

Where Compound Lands

Composite B. Credit quality without commercial momentum. The full-rating question is stark: can stewardship of a trusted codebase alone sustain a franchise, or does lending leadership require the shipping cadence Compound has lost?

Composite — Conservative (Recommended Headline)
B
31.3 / 100 · lowest of the three dimensions

"A chain is as strong as its weakest link." The conservative composite takes the weakest dimension and inherits any notching cap, so a single structural weakness cannot be diluted by strength elsewhere.

Analyst Note
Blue-chip codebase; development pace and mindshare fading vs Aave/Morpho.
Screen vs full rating. This is Methodology v1.0 applied in screening form: the same bands, weights, caps and grade scale as the full Aave workbook, reduced to the highest-signal metrics per dimension so the whole universe stays comparable in one table. Screen grades are provisional. A full rating — per-metric sourcing plus four stress scenarios — is produced when a protocol is selected for publication. Every input is an analyst estimate as of July 27, 2026, drawn from public data (DefiLlama, protocol docs, governance forums, rekt.news) and judgment, and should be verified before being relied upon.
Want the full treatment? See the complete Aave rating — per-metric sourcing, four stress scenarios, and notching-cap analysis — for what a published rating looks like. Join the waitlist to get each new full rating as it publishes.