DeFiScoreAudit shield logo
DeFiScoreAudit
Detecting DeFi Risk, Before It Breaks
← Back to DeFiScoreAudit
Rating Screen · Methodology v1.0

Bedrock

LRT · BR · $0.5B TVL. Bedrock is a multi-asset liquid restaking protocol spanning ETH, BTC, and other collateral through its uniETH and uniBTC products. Breadth is its pitch; the screen reads that breadth as risk surface that its audit and track record do not yet cover.

Screened July 27, 2026 Methodology v1.0 (screen) Caps Triggered 0
Solvency
B
41.5 / 100
Will it survive and pay users back?
Legitimacy
BB
54 / 100
Is it real, credible, delivering its stated aim?
Growth
B
31.3 / 100
Adoption toward the protocol's own goal, peer-relative.
Axis I · Credit Grade

Solvency — B

Solvency screens at B. Sub-1x fee coverage, a 12% unlock schedule, and a 50% drawdown place it in the weakest solvency cohort. The 5/10 risk score is the lowest among LRTs here — multi-asset restaking multiplies the number of bridges, custody arrangements, and slashing regimes the protocol depends on simultaneously.

Solvency ScorecardB
MetricRawNormalizedWeightWeighted
Sustainability ratio (revenue / emissions)0.8x
30%10.5
Does it earn more than it prints? Above 1x is self-sustaining.
TVL stability (max 90-day drawdown)50%
25%10
Bank-run indicator: worst 90-day deposit flight.
Unlock pressure (next 12 months)12%
15%6
Incoming insider sell pressure vs circulating supply.
Risk quality (collateral, oracle, exploit posture)5 / 10
30%15
Combined collateral quality, price-feed dependence, and loss history.
FINAL DIMENSION SCORE41.5 → B
Axis II · Legitimacy Score

Legitimacy — BB

Legitimacy screens at BB with the thinnest inputs in the cohort: 6/10 across audits, team visibility, and delivery. Nothing suggests bad faith; the record is simply shallower than peers holding comparable user funds.

Legitimacy ScorecardBB
MetricRawNormalizedWeightWeighted
Audit coverage6 / 10
25%15
Code credibility: firms, recency, findings resolved.
Team & transparency6 / 10
25%15
Doxxed vs anonymous; track record; disclosure quality.
Delivery vs stated roadmap6 / 10
20%12
Does shipped product match the promise? The core legitimacy test.
Governance & decentralization4 / 10
30%12
Real distributed control vs theater; participation quality.
FINAL DIMENSION SCORE54 → BB
Axis III · Adoption Trajectory

Growth — B

Growth screens at B: 7% share, -40% TVL, weak momentum. The multi-asset thesis has not produced differentiated inflows.

Growth ScorecardB
MetricRawNormalizedWeightWeighted
TVL 12-month trend-40%
35%8.8
Adoption of the core product, in absolute terms.
Category market share7%
30%12
Peer-relative position: winning or losing its niche.
Momentum & users3 / 10
35%10.5
Usage trajectory and integration growth, filtered for incentives.
FINAL DIMENSION SCORE31.3 → B
Verdict

Where Bedrock Lands

Composite B. Widest risk surface, thinnest verification, in the screen's most deflated category. A full rating would prioritize proof-of-reserves across every asset line before scoring anything else.

Composite — Conservative (Recommended Headline)
B
31.3 / 100 · lowest of the three dimensions

"A chain is as strong as its weakest link." The conservative composite takes the weakest dimension and inherits any notching cap, so a single structural weakness cannot be diluted by strength elsewhere.

Analyst Note
Multi-asset LRT; thinner audit/track record.
Screen vs full rating. This is Methodology v1.0 applied in screening form: the same bands, weights, caps and grade scale as the full Aave workbook, reduced to the highest-signal metrics per dimension so the whole universe stays comparable in one table. Screen grades are provisional. A full rating — per-metric sourcing plus four stress scenarios — is produced when a protocol is selected for publication. Every input is an analyst estimate as of July 27, 2026, drawn from public data (DefiLlama, protocol docs, governance forums, rekt.news) and judgment, and should be verified before being relied upon.
Want the full treatment? See the complete Aave rating — per-metric sourcing, four stress scenarios, and notching-cap analysis — for what a published rating looks like. Join the waitlist to get each new full rating as it publishes.