Detecting DeFi Risk, Before It Breaks
← All Chain Ratings
Chain Rating · Scorecard v1.0

Ethereum

Blockchain · ETH · $40.9B DeFi TVL. Ethereum is the settlement layer for just over half of all value in DeFi. It is graded on the chains scorecard: the same three axes as every protocol, with inputs suited to a base network.

Data As Of November 12, 2026 Methodology Chains v1.0 (provisional) Revenue To Coin Burn + staker payout · Low
SolvencyCREDIT GRADE
BBB
68.3 / 100
Can the network keep paying for its own security?
Legitimacy
AA
84 / 100
Is it what it says it is, and who controls it?
GrowthOUTLOOK
BB
49.3 / 100
Is usage growing, measured by value and fees?
How Revenue Reaches The Coin

Does Ethereum's Revenue Help ETH Holders?

Mechanism
Burn + staker payout
Pass-through today
Low
  • Burn: the base fee of every transaction is destroyed. In the 30 days to November 8, 2026, about 2,700 ETH was burned against roughly 89,000 ETH issued, so the burn offset about 3% of new supply.
  • Staker payout: tips and block-building income go to validators. The staking rate was about 2.5% in late October 2026, most of it new issuance, not fees.
  • No buyback and no revenue-funded treasury.

What it means for a holder. At current fee levels, network revenue does little for the coin. A holder who does not stake is diluted by under 1% a year. The mechanism is strong when the chain is busy (supply shrank in 2022–23) and weak now, because cheap L2 data moved fee-paying activity off mainnet.

Descriptive, not scored separately: the fee-against-issuance input in Solvency already carries the economic weight. Not investment advice.

Axis I · Credit Grade

Solvency — BBB

Solvency screens at BBB (68.3 / 100). Strongest input: supply pressure, next 12 months. Weakest input: fee revenue against new issuance.

Solvency ScorecardBBB
MetricRawNormalizedWeightWeighted
Fee revenue against new issuance0.08x
25%2.5
Chain fees of about $176M over the last 12 months against roughly 1.09M ETH of new issuance (about $2.2B).
Stake concentration8 / 10
25%20
Largest staker, Lido, holds about 21.5% of staked ETH, below the one-third line. About 35% of supply is staked.
Supply pressure, next 12 months0.9%
15%15
No vesting or unlocks. Supply grew about 87,000 ETH in 30 days, under 1% a year.
DeFi value stability (worst 90-day drawdown)21%
15%12.8
Liveness and incident history9 / 10
20%18
No chain halt on record; brief finality delays in 2023.
FINAL DIMENSION SCORE68.3 → BBB
Axis II · Legitimacy

Legitimacy — AA

Legitimacy screens at AA (84 / 100). Strongest input: team and foundation transparency. Weakest input: delivery against roadmap.

Legitimacy ScorecardAA
MetricRawNormalizedWeightWeighted
Client diversity and audits8 / 10
20%16
Multiple independent clients on both the execution and consensus layers. Current share of the largest client not verified.
Team and foundation transparency9 / 10
20%18
Delivery against roadmap7 / 10
20%14
Fusaka shipped December 3, 2025. Glamsterdam slipped from the first half of 2026 and had no mainnet date in early November.
Governance of upgrades9 / 10
25%22.5
Rough consensus among client teams; no admin key and no token vote.
Supply distribution9 / 10
15%13.5
No insider vesting outstanding.
FINAL DIMENSION SCORE84 → AA
Axis III · Growth Outlook

Growth — BB

Growth screens at BB (49.3 / 100). Strongest input: share of all-chain tvl. Weakest input: fee revenue, 12-month trend.

Growth ScorecardBB
MetricRawNormalizedWeightWeighted
DeFi TVL, 12-month trend-43%
25%6.3
Share of all-chain TVL52.8%
20%20
Fee revenue, 12-month trend-79%
20%2
Users and developers6 / 10
35%21
Staking at a record share of supply and activity moving to L2s, against collapsing mainnet fees. No address or developer counts gathered.
FINAL DIMENSION SCORE49.3 → BB
Verdict

Where Ethereum Lands

Weakest axis: Growth, BB. The network is as credible as any in the screen and its supply is clean. The open question is economic: whether mainnet fees recover enough to fund security without issuance.

Credit Grade — Solvency
BBB
68.3 / 100

The credit grade answers one question: can the network keep funding its security and stay live. Legitimacy and Growth are published beside it and are never averaged into it.

Analyst Note
The most decentralized and widely used smart-contract chain, with a security budget that fee revenue currently covers at about one-tenth.
Chains scorecard v1.0, provisional. Base networks are graded on the same three axes and AAA-to-D scale as DeFi protocols, with inputs suited to a chain. Fee, TVL and share figures come from DefiLlama as of November 12, 2026; the 0–10 inputs are analyst estimates from public sources and judgment. Growth leans on DeFi TVL and fee revenue, which understates chains used mainly for payments. Every input should be verified before being relied upon.
Other Rated Chains
ChainSolvencyLegitimacyGrowth
SolanaBBBBBB
TRONBBBBBBB
CardanoBBBACCC
AvalancheBBBBBCCC
SuiBBBCCC
NEAR ProtocolBBBBBBB
HederaBBBCCC
TONBBBBB

See all rated chains →